If “live service” as a term is being used incorrectly by the general public, then what is the PROPER term? Or is there none, and so people will continue to use “live service” as the colloquial for whatever it is specifically that publishers have been pushing to produce, like what Destiny 1 & 2, Helldivers 2, Concord, Overwatch 2, Marvel Rivals, PoE 1 &2, Warframe, even Fortnight and Rocket League, etc etc are? the games where things are constantly changing rather than having more spaced out incremental updates of a mostly static game, and often have a lot of microtransactions and/or some sort of multiplayer component? Because there always seems to be some sort of extra commitment to these games that other games do not have. As in, a company makes a great non-“live service” game and can support it no problem for at least a year after release with patches and DLCs, but then the studio falls apart when they try to work on what the general public calls a “live service” game.